missing fonts, reflow) or changes required, prepress operators may struggle. So while they may be able to open a Publisher file, if there are issues (e.g.
#CONVERTING PUBLISHER TO PDF PROBLEMS SOFTWARE#
If a printer does have a dedicated Windows OS machine for client supplied artwork from Windows OS devices, it is also likely that the art department staff won’t be as proficient in Publisher as they would their regular design software such as InDesign. This does not necessarily mean that the art department can accept Publisher files, nor are they trained to use Publisher. In this situation, the salesperson loads a copy of Publisher onto a sales computer that uses a Windows OS, and then declares that the company can accept Publisher files. In my experience, I’ve found that it isn’t the Art department that claims to be able to accept Publisher files, but a Salesperson who does not want to disappoint clients by turning away artwork created using Publisher. tied into the platesetter software, for their colour laser copier, or elsewhere in the building such as estimating, sales… somewhere outside of the art department). This is where many commercial printers will stop and say that they require press-ready PDF artwork instead.įor the remaining printers that do have Windows OS machines, these machines are not necessarily in the artroom and used for other purposes (e.g. This means that Publisher files cannot be accepted as the software is not made for the Apple Macintosh. In a country where English is the first language spoken, it is most likely that commercial printers will use the Adobe Creative Suite on an Apple Macintosh for the production of their artwork. Issues within the client’s artwork due to inexperience.The difficulties associated with earlier versions of Publisher.Their staff are unskilled in Publisher.Don’t have Publisher or the Windows OS.Reasons that many commercial printers will not accept Publisher files are: So why does Publisher have this reputation? What has it done to deserve such a bad name among commercial printers? Does it really deserve this infamy or is it all hyperbole? With the software given nicknames such as “Punisher” or “Rubbisher”, old colleagues who would load a client’s file only to realise it was a Publisher file would groan with frustration, normally followed by the words “I hope they supplied a PDF as well”. My employer was one of a select few that would accept Publisher files, and while we would output the artwork to film or plates, it was done on several conditions – the main condition being a handling fee of 50% of the total. Years ago, as a prepress operator at a service bureau, I would often get requests to prepare Publisher files for film or plates for clients (sent by their printers as soon as they heard the word “Publisher”). However, from a print and design standpoint, Publisher is often seen as a nuisance and source of frustration. To people outside of the printing trade, Microsoft Publisher appears to be a price-competitive alternative to layout software such as Adobe InDesign or Quark Xpress, without the training required to use that software.
0 kommentar(er)
